SAN FRANCISCO, July 14 (Xinhua) — Stanford University announced Monday it has joined 19 other colleges and universities in the western United States in a lawsuit challenging a new federal directive affecting international students, and has also joined 58 other universities in a separate legal filing supporting another challenge to the federal directive.
According to the announcement, Stanford and the other colleges and universities are seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to block the implementation of a new rule limiting international students’ use of online coursework while studying in the United States. In the second case, Stanford and the other universities have filed an amicus brief supporting a challenge brought by Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
“Our international students are essential members of the Stanford community, and this new rule creates unnecessary uncertainty and complexity for them,” said Stanford president Marc Tessier-Lavigne. “We are seeking the federal government’s support and flexibility as colleges and universities work to provide for both the health and the academic goals of our students amid the unprecedented circumstances that have been brought about by the pandemic.”
At issue is a July 6 directive by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) regarding the ability of international students who are in the United States on F-1 visas to take online courses.
Previous federal guidance issued in the spring had allowed these students additional flexibility to take online courses if needed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the new directive says that this fall, students on F-1 visas will not be able to take a full online course load and still remain in the United States.
In the lawsuit and motion for a temporary restraining order filed in the U.S. District Court in Oregon on Monday, the coalition of 20 universities said the new federal directive had created “disarray” for international students studying in the United States and for their respective colleges and universities.
The establishments argued that in reversing its previous course and issuing the new directive, the federal government failed to meet the “reasoned decision-making” standard of the Administrative Procedure Act. This “unwarranted and unlawful action threatens to disrupt the education of hundreds of thousands of hardworking students and their academic environments and missions,” the suit said.
Similarly, the amicus brief in the Harvard/MIT case filed by 59 institutions including Stanford said the July 6 federal directive is “arbitrary and capricious.”
“We hope that we can quickly get a court ruling that will restore the flexibility that (the) DHS wisely gave to universities in March to deal with this pandemic by providing online instruction for international students as necessary to allow them to continue their education safely,” said Debra Zumwalt, vice president and general counsel of Stanford.
In 2019, the total number of international students enrolled in U.S. colleges was 1,095,299. China has been the country’s largest source of international students for 10 consecutive years, according to the Institute of International Education. Enditem
- Federal lawsuit seeks to stop Wisconsin voter purge
- What's the latest on the 'duplication of benefits' trap that's still affecting Louisiana flood victims?
- New ruling means Supreme Court dodges Obamacare showdown, but legal fight rolls on
- Column: UC contracts with Catholic hospitals allow religious limits on medical staff, students
- EXCLUSIVE: It’s party time at Standing Rock: Dakota Access protests turn to wild celebrations after the Obama administration caves in and blocks pipeline
- Georgia "heartbeat" abortion bill could join the legal fight to overturn Roe v. Wade
- Trump CAN be sued to find out what money his D.C. hotel is getting from foreign governments, federal judge rules, as he gives go-ahead to 'emoluments clause' case
- When they rise: Thousands of students march in solidarity with JMI and AMU students, and to oppose CAA
- Anti-CAA protests: Toll rises to 15 in Uttar Pradesh; vandalism during Bihar bandh
- Citizenship Act Protests: More violence in Uttar Pradesh, death toll climbs to 16
- CAA protests: 15 people, including 8-year-old, killed in UP violence
- More violence in UP, protesters indulge in vandalism during Bihar bandh, peaceful demonstration in Assam
- Trump's reversal on transgender bathroom directive: How we got here
- U.S. Sen. John Kennedy makes case to Trump for 'duplication of benefits' fix
- 2 killed in Karnataka; anti-CAA protests grip India
- Bay Briefing: What would a 2010 San Franciscan think of the city now?
- Michael Bloomberg, 77, gets ready to put his name on 2020 Democratic ballot in Alabama - opening way for $52 BILLION former NY mayor to make dramatic entry into presidential race
- Our pick of the decade’s eight best young economists
- Anti-Trans Bathroom Debate: How a Local Religious-Right Faction Launched a National Movement
- Secret NYPD Files: Officers Who Lie And Brutally Beat People Can Keep Their Jobs
Stanford joins lawsuit to block federal rule affecting U.S. int'l students have 763 words, post on www.xinhuanet.com at July 14, 2020. This is cached page on Law Breaking News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.