• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Law Breaking News

Latest law breaking news from around the world

  • Submit
  • Disclaimers
  • About
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Show Search
Hide Search
You are here: Home / ‘Sociological Gobbledygook’: Justice Roberts Apparently Not Buying Dems’ Claim in Gerrymandering Case

‘Sociological Gobbledygook’: Justice Roberts Apparently Not Buying Dems’ Claim in Gerrymandering Case

· October 3, 2017 ·

Judging by Chief Justice John Robert‘s comments on Tuesday, he seems skeptical in a case over whether gerrymandering can get too political.Oral argument for the case, Gill v. Whitford, happened at the court Tuesday. Democratic voters in Wisconsin say Republican lawmakers in the state drew district lines to disproportionately benefit GOPers. They argue this is unconstitutional. Republicans say judges should say out of this. This is a political matter.The Supreme Court has heard this question before, but their decision left so much unclear. In 2004’s Vieth v. Jubelirer, justices didn’t even settle on a majority. A four-member plurality led by the late Antonin Scalia agreed that courts shouldn’t be involved in this sort of redistricting matter. A fifth justice, Anthony Kennedy, partially agreed in his concurring opinion. He argued there remained no good way to measure if a district was truly drawn in an overly political, unconstitutional way. But he was open to seeing a test that could get the job done.“If workable standards do emerge to measure these burdens, however, courts should be prepared to order relief,” he wrote.On Tuesday, Samuel Alito joined Roberts in voicing skepticism about the Dems’ proposed test, called the efficiency gap.“Has there been a great body of… Read full this story

  • Boris Johnson's bid for snap election is CRUSHED: Corbyn chickens out of letting public go to the polls as MPs inflict humiliating defeat on PM hours after passing law to stop No Deal
  • Why the Redskins scored a victory in the Supreme Court’s ruling in favor of The Slants
  • Former 49er Eric Reid would have an NFL job ... if league owners had learned anything
  • MMQB: On Dan, Dean and the Draft
  • Aaron Hernandez found not guilty of Boston double murder: Breaking down jury’s decision
  • Tom Brady tells the story of the Super Bowl 51 comeback
  • Amid chilling allegations, analyzing the latest Title IX lawsuit against Baylor
  • The Decision and the Doink
  • FIFA probes World Cup award to Germany
  • Time for Indians, MLB to get rid of ridiculous and offensive Chief Wahoo
‘Sociological Gobbledygook’: Justice Roberts Apparently Not Buying Dems’ Claim in Gerrymandering Case have 338 words, post on lawnewz.com at October 3, 2017. This is cached page on Law Breaking News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.

Primary Sidebar

RSS Recent Stories

  • After U.S. talks, Sudan sees path to lifting sanctions soon
  • Man charged in murder of Harris County Sheriff’s deputy
  • U.S. special envoy to Ukraine resigns
  • Tesla and CEO Elon Musk violated federal labor law, judge rules
  • U.S. special envoy to Ukraine resigns amid impeachment inquiry

Sponsored Links

  • Phú Quốc authority wants to bring ’troublesome’ Russian girl to mainland
Copyright © 2021 Law Breaking News. Power by Wordpress.