• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Law Breaking News

Latest law breaking news from around the world

  • Submit
  • Disclaimers
  • About
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Show Search
Hide Search
You are here: Home / COFC: Contractor Stuck With Bill For Substantially Higher Than Expected Costs Under Firm-Fixed Price Requirements Contract

COFC: Contractor Stuck With Bill For Substantially Higher Than Expected Costs Under Firm-Fixed Price Requirements Contract

· August 20, 2015 ·

A recent Court of Federal Claims decision serves as a reminder to contractors of the perils of firm-fixed-price contracts in unpredictable environments.The case, Agility Defense & Government Services, Inc. v. United States, involved an “unusually high-risk” firm-fixed-price requirements contract between Agility Defense & Government Services (“Agility”) and the Defense Reutilization Management Services (“DRMS”).  Under that contract, Agility agreed to dispose of all surplus military property at six locations in Afghanistan, Kuwait, and Iraq, regardless of quantity.  In exchange, Agility received $45.2 million and the right to the proceeds of sales of scrap material from the surplus property.  In the solicitation process, DRMS provided offerors historical workload information for each of the six locations, but declined to provide workload projections or estimates.  From the start, the actual workload at almost every location was much greater than the historical baseline. Agility sought to recover $6.9 million in additional labor costs through an equitable adjustment on three different theories: (1) that a constructive change occurred; (2) that the historical information provided to offerors constituted a “negligent estimate;” and (3) that DRMS breached the warranty of reasonable accuracy in the solicitation phase.The court rejected all three arguments.  Agility’s constructive change, negligent estimate, and breach of… Read full this story

  • Gold prices fall sharply to Rs 50,665 per 10 gram, silver tanks Rs 4,268 a kg
  • Fixing the rules of the economy
  • Central Vista redevelopment: Contractors will need to curb air, noise pollution
  • India Cements net surges eight-fold on cost control
  • Yellow metal prices flat at Rs 52,420/10 gm, gold futures tank over Rs 1,000 on positive COVID vaccine data
  • Moderna CEO says the firm could get emergency FDA approval for a vaccine in December if trial results expected this month are successful
  • Gold price down marginally at Rs 42,613 per 10 gram, silver slips Rs 135 per kg
  • Britain's housing boom puts £9,400 on average property: Values rose 5% in September... as experts predict price dip in 2021 but 27% rise over next five years
  • Gold price extends fall for fourth straight day, but ends week with marginal gains
  • California Voters Saved the Gig Economy But Workers May Pay a Heavy Price
COFC: Contractor Stuck With Bill For Substantially Higher Than Expected Costs Under Firm-Fixed Price Requirements Contract have 334 words, post on www.natlawreview.com at August 20, 2015. This is cached page on Law Breaking News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.

Primary Sidebar

RSS Recent Stories

  • After U.S. talks, Sudan sees path to lifting sanctions soon
  • Man charged in murder of Harris County Sheriff’s deputy
  • U.S. special envoy to Ukraine resigns
  • Tesla and CEO Elon Musk violated federal labor law, judge rules
  • U.S. special envoy to Ukraine resigns amid impeachment inquiry

Sponsored Links

  • Phú Quốc authority wants to bring ’troublesome’ Russian girl to mainland
Copyright © 2021 Law Breaking News. Power by Wordpress.